Human Resources
Sharp rise in mental health claims: 37% surge in workplaces

People & Culture: Workplace safety has traditionally focused on physical risks, but a growing awareness points to another crucial factor: psychosocial safety.
Psychosocial safety – how work environments impact mental health and wellbeing – is gaining increased attention as governments and regulators focus on how organisations treat their employees.
A recent Safe Work Australia report showed that mental health conditions accounted for 9% of all serious workers’ compensation claims, a 36.9% increase since 2017-18. The most common mechanisms attributed to claims for mental health conditions were work-related harassment and/or workplace bullying (27.5%), work pressure (25.2%) and exposure to workplace or occupational violence (16.4%).
Associate Professor Carlo Caponecchia, Associate Dean of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at UNSW Science said that new work health and safety regulations addressing psychosocial risks have been introduced in all Australian states except Victoria.
“It’s important to say that these are not new requirements. They’ve just been emphasised or elevated. The fact that psychological health and safety weren’t being protected has meant that it’s been elevated in the regulation.
“What these changes really mean is that you have a duty to control the things within your control, the things in your system of work, the way the work is organised, supervised, managed, where it’s done and how it’s done,” he explained.
Psychosocial hazards are often less visible than physical risks but can have a significant impact on employees’ mental health and wellbeing. These hazards typically arise from the way work is structured, the organisational culture, and relationships within the workplace.
“When we’re talking about psychosocial hazards, we’re talking about sources of harm that exist in the work system that can have a negative effect on your physical and psychological health,” said A/Prof. Caponecchia.
“They include factors like excessive workloads, unclear job roles, and lack of support.”
To help create a psychosocially safe workplace, businesses need to take a proactive stance, said A/Prof. Caponecchia. Addressing psychosocial hazards requires a shift in workplace design, management practices, and employee interaction.
He said that hiring more workers to fix a high workload issue is not actually very practical.
“What we try to do is think about all the small elements of jobs that have the potential for some change that’s beneficial,” he said.
“Perhaps we can look at the timing of particular tasks… cross-skilling of our teams… how we might offer opportunities for professional development… [to] make that job less harmful.”
On a broader scale, A/Prof. Caponecchia said that psychosocial safety “is not about managing mental ill health. It’s about managing the things in your business that could create those outcomes in future.”
This shift in approach ensures that businesses focus on preventing harm before it happens, creating a healthier work environment for everyone.
Addressing psychosocial safety is not only a regulatory necessity but also a strategic advantage for businesses.
“My research showed that psychosocial hazards are not new; they have been documented for over a century. However, understanding the complexities of work organisation, including power dynamics and job insecurity, is crucial,” said Michael Quinlan, Emeritus Professor in the School of Management & Governance at UNSW Business School.
“Addressing these factors involves a multi-model approach that goes beyond the commonly used frameworks, incorporating insights from industrial relations and organisational dynamics.
“Organisations that implement effective psychosocial safety measures experience higher employee engagement, lower turnover rates, and enhanced overall performance,” said Prof. Quinlan.
“The benefits are clear: employees in supportive work environments are more motivated, productive, and less prone to burnout.”
Prof. Quinlan emphasised the benefits of involving workers in decision-making processes.
“If we’re going to make work that is both productive and healthier and safer into the future, we need to do that by involving workers meaningfully in decision-making processes about their work,” he said.
“We can’t rely on leaders, corporate chiefs, executives, or consulting firms to make those decisions.
“Because the record is they do it very badly. And they do it for a set of interests, their own set of interests, but not that of the great workforce. And that’s the reason I think we’re finding psychosocial hazards are becoming such an issue,” he said.
In reimagining healthcare across the entire patient journey, Health Industry HubTM is the only one-stop-hub uniting the diversity of the Pharma, MedTech, Diagnostics & Biotech sectors to inspire meaningful change.
The Health Industry HubTM content is copyright protected. Access is available under individual user licenses. Please click here to subscribe and visit T&Cs here.
News & Trends - Pharmaceuticals

Did the Federal Budget deliver for health?
Health is the Federal Government’s largest financial commitment outside social welfare, absorbing approximately 15% of taxpayer funds. Yet, tonight’s Budget […]
MoreNews & Trends - Pharmaceuticals

How can the government Close the Gap with forecasted decline in funding?
The Federal Government will increase investment in First Nations health programs by just 2.8% to $1.4 billion in 2025-26 – […]
MoreNews & Trends - Biotechnology

Local biotech kicks off phase 3 trial for lung cancer combination therapy
ASX-listed biotech company Immutep has reached a major milestone, announcing that the first patient has been successfully dosed in its […]
MoreMedical and Science

Research on life support as government Budget fails to deliver critical funding
Stakeholders are voicing disappointment over the government’s Budget failure to at least maintain research funding in line with inflation. In […]
More