Surgeons voice concerns over access to General Use Items from Prostheses List

MedTech News: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) retains the concerns about the removal of ‘general use’ items from the Prostheses List (PL).

In its submission to Prostheses List Reforms – Consultation Paper 5 – Bundling of Benefits for General Use Items, RACS was supported by General Surgeons Australia (GSA) and the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) in the issues the College raised.

“Ensuring surgeons have the ability to access what is required to successfully complete a case and obtain the best outcome must be of paramount concern in any reform. Funding must be adequate for the general use items without increasing contract disagreements between the payers and hospitals,” Professor Mark Frydenberg, Chair of Health Policy and Advocacy Committee, RACS said in the submission.

RACS has communicated with a number of stakeholders in the sector who have argued that the bundled benefits’ mandatory funding models proposed by the Department on the advice of IHACPA could have a number of undesirable impacts.  

“These potentially undesirable impacts include reduced availability of particular types of general use items, and hospitals restricting particular types of procedures, or even restricting particular clinicians who may use an above average number of general use items, due to cost pressures. Similar negative impacts have been predicted once the period during which mandatory bundled benefit payments ends on 1 July 2025,” Professor Frydenberg said in the submission.

RACS has been supportive of reforms to the PL which “improve the long-term sustainability and cost efficiency of healthcare”. 

However, the College recognised that there are likely to be clinicians who use unnecessary types or amounts of general use items.

“An appropriate reform would be to increase clinicians’ focus on choosing wisely in relation to such items, and prosthetic devices more generally. In principle RACS would be willing to work with regulators to educate surgeons and other clinicians about best practice in the use of such items and even provide opinions about different general use items and other disposables and prosthetics,” Professor Frydenberg said in the submission.

RACS is calling for an independent monitoring of procedures, and access to, and use of, devices removed from the PL, if the reforms continue as planned. Should monitoring find that clinicians believe their clinical choices have been significantly impacted, and/or should monitoring find that hospitals are restricting the procedures they provide due to these changes, then the changes should be revisited.  

Reimagining healthcare across the entire patient journey: Health Industry Hub^TM is the only one-stop-hub bringing the diversity of Pharma, MedTech, Diagnostics & Biotech sectors together to inspire meaningful change in healthcare.

The content on Health Industry Hub is copyright protected and can only be accessed under individual user licenses. To subscribe, please click here and visit T&Cs here.