News - Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer and MSD oral antivirals ‘a significant step forward’, says Dr Griffin

Pharma News: The new oral antiviral treatments, Pfizer’s Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir + ritonavir) and MSD’s Lagevrio (molnupiravir), have been approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in Australia.
Dr Paul Griffin, Director of Infectious Diseases at Mater Health Services, Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Queensland, and Medical Director and Principal Investigator at Q-Pharm, Nucleus Network, told Health Industry Hub “It’s great to now have two safe and effective oral options approved for use in Australia in mild-moderate COVID-19 positive patients at high risk of progressing to severe disease.”
In exploring the efficacy differences of these oral therapies, Dr Griffin said “While there may be a tendency to compare efficacy rates, it is important to point out that no head-to-head trials have been conducted to date and that any differences in the reported efficacy rates between the two therapies may possibly be accounted for by differences in other variables including the design and conduct of the trials themselves, the populations studied and their inherent risk and rates of COVID infection at the time, to name a few.
“They have different mechanisms of action, however fundamentally both work by stopping the virus replicating or reproducing. They are both a five day courses in total, with doses given orally twice a day. However, Paxlovid is three pills per dose and Lagevrio is four.
“In terms of differences, perhaps the main one is that Paxlovid has significant drug-drug interactions. This is clearly not a major concern and the component responsible for this, Ritonavir*, has been in use for the treatment of HIV for some time. However, prescribers not familiar with these will have to be educated to be on the lookout for drugs that may pose a problem.”
Dr Griffin added “Given the similarity between them, aside from the drug-drug interaction issue, it is likely that in fact logistical issues such as supply or availability will actually determine who receives which therapy. However, given they are both effective, patients should be happy to receive whichever is available to them first.
“As these therapies are given orally and therefore able to be utilised in the community, their approval is likely to represent a significant step forward in our ability to manage COVID-19 including reducing the chance of high-risk patients needing to go to hospital and progressing to more severe disease.”
You may also like: Medicines Australia CEO reveals policy and advocacy focus for 2022
*AbbVie markets Ritonavir in Australia
News - Pharmaceuticals
New vaccine guidelines risk further decline in immunisation
The intensifying political and public scrutiny of Dr Anthony Fauci has become emblematic of a wider struggle over trust in […]
MoreNews - Pharmaceuticals
The weight of the wait: GLP-1 boom hits PBS roadblock
More than one million Australians have been dispensed a GLP-1 receptor agonist over the past five years, accelerating the emergence […]
MoreNews - MedTech & Diagnostics
As insurer blame game escalates, patients miss out on the promise of private health
The Age and Sydney Morning Herald’s investigation into the Prescribed List (PL) and the pricing of medical devices has drawn […]
MoreLeadership & Management
David Henderson appointed Takeda Oceania Country Head
David Henderson has been appointed Country Head for Takeda Oceania, succeeding Dave Pearce, as the pharmaceutical company continues to reshape […]
More